Sunday, January 22, 2012

Sc primary results

  • Newt Gingrich has been declared the winner of the South Carolina presidential primary. With three presidential races finished to this point, there have been three winners. Rick Santorum won the Iowa caucus. Mitt Romney was victorious in New Hampshire.
  • (YAHOO!)
  • POLL: Which candidate would be the best president? In all, more than $12 million was spent on television ads by the candidates and their allies in South Carolina, much of it on attacks designed to degrade the support of rivals.
  • (Newsday)
  • COMMENTARY | It was a soggy day in South Carolina as voters ventured out resulting in an outcome that some found as a surprise. I knew before the results were announced that Newt Gingrich would win the primary.
  • (YAHOO!)
  • Saturday night's victory will give Gingrich new confidence as he heads toward Florida's primary and later contests. Former Pennsylvania Sen.
  • (Marketwatch)
  • Rick Santorum did not win the South Carolina primary in the traditional sense. Gingrich had 40% for a surprisingly momentous win. Romney had 27%, with Santorum at 18% and Paul in last at 12%. Yet despite the results, Mr. Santorum is standing his ground.
  • (Washington Times)
  • South Carolina voters in Saturday's Republican presidential primary were focused on the economy and looking for a candidate who could defeat President Barack Obama in this fall's election, preliminary results from an exit poll of voters showed.
  • (Chicago Sun-Times)
  • Check back here for updates from our reporters and producers throughout the first-in-the-South primary state of South Carolina. Tune in live at 6 p.m. ET for CNNs live special coverage and follow real-times results at CNNPolitics.
  • (CNN)
  • Polls in South Carolina close at 7 p.m. ET and results will be at OTUS News. Click below for ABC News and Yahoo News live analysis and commentary on what has become a very exciting GOP nominating process.
  • (ABC News)
  • In 2008, about 1.95 million votes were cast in the GOP primary. Mr.
  • (Wall Street Journal)

No comments:

Post a Comment