Prop. 37 Will Test California's Appetite For GMO Food
International food and chemical conglomerates, including Monsanto Co. and DuPont Co., have contributed about $35 million to defeat Proposition 37 on the November ballot. It also would ban labeling or advertising genetically altered food as "natural.www.huffingtonpost.com
GUEST OPINION: Yes on Prop. 37
Proposition 37 would label foods that contain genetically engineered ingredients. Also called GMOs, these are plants or animals that have had their DNA artificially altered by genes from other species in ways that can't occur in nature.www.pressdemocrat.com
Prop 37: California Soil Scientist Says Label Up!
This November, Californians will vote on a historic proposal that would require genetically modified foods in supermarkets to be labeled.www.huffingtonpost.com
Is Prop. 37 a 'Ban' on Genetically Modified Foods? Fact-Checking the Arguments
by Amy Standen. KQED Public Radio's Forum program ran a debate last week on Proposition 37, which requires the labeling of foods containing genetically modified ingredients. It was a spirited discussion, and we thought one exchange, in particular, ...blogs.kqed.org
California Prop 37 - Rebuttal to Annoying Pro-GMO TV Ads:
October 6, 2012 Permalink Tweet: California Prop 37 - Rebuttal to Annoying Pro-GMO TV Ads: click here. Submitted by Billy Butterfield.www.opednews.com
Proposition 37 at a glance
Support: Consumer groups and the organic food industry say the measure gives shoppers more information about what they're eating and allows them to decide whether they want to buy food made with genetically modified ingredients. Oppose: Agribusiness ...www.vcstar.com
Foes of Prop. 37 forced to alter ad
Opponents of Proposition 37, which calls for labeling food made with genetically engineered ingredients, were forced this week to retool their latest television commercial after Stanford University objected to its implied endorsement.www.sfgate.com
PRO: Should genetically engineered foods be labeled?
Proposition 37, the California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act, will be on the November ballot. Companies such as Monsanto, Dupont and Syngenta will probably create ads telling us that labeling is expensive and unnecessary because GMOs ...www.jewishjournal.com
Prop 37: What a waste
In an age when farmers are feeding arsenic to chickens, I am amazed that people oppose Prop 37. Mr. Lane, I invite you to eat a conventional tortilla chip.www.vcstar.com
Prop 37: Labeling of Genetically Modified Foods – Will We Be Better Off If We ...
Proposition 37 requires labeling foods you buy in the supermarket as GMO foods if they contain genetically modified ingredients. It also prevents labeling GMO foods as "natural." Some foods can be exempted from the GMO label such as otherwise organic ...obrag.org
Prop 37: 8 Reasons for Voting Yes for Labeling GMO Foods
Meanwhile, the "No on 37″ ads are proliferating. They are saying that Prop 37 is arbitrary because it doesn't call for labeling alcohol, restaurant food, meat or cheese.sandiegofreepress.org
In Prop 37 food fight, is fair play losing out?
In the bruising, high-dollar battle over California's Proposition 37, truth has often been a casualty. On Nov. 6, voters will decide whether to approve the country's first law requiring labels for genetically modified foods. More than $36 million has ...www.mercurynews.com
$34.4 Million Can't Seem To Buy Prop 37 Opponents Like Monsanto and Big ...
... Million Can't Seem To Buy Prop 37 Opponents Like Monsanto and Big Food Their Own Facts. A new L.A. Times poll shows Prop 37, which would label genetically engineered foods, winning by more than a 2-to-1 margin among registered California voters.www.alternet.org
Our View: Prop. 37 should be rejected
Opponents of genetically engineered food are taking advantage of that desire as they promote Proposition 37, an ill-conceived initiative on the Nov. 6 ballot that would require labels on some food that is genetically modified or contains even the ...www.mercedsunstar.com
No on Proposition 37
But Proposition 37 would make an exception for genetically engineered food, requiring that it be labeled before being sold in California.www.latimes.com
University of California at Davis Reports Make Dubious Claims on Prop 37
The first, entitled "California's Proposition 37: Effects of Mandatory Labeling of GM Food," was co-authored by University of California at Davis professor Colin Carter and published in the newsletter of the University of California Giannini Foundation ...www.huffingtonpost.com
Proposition 37 is unnecessary
What Prop. 37 supporters claim is their intent is to warn the public about foods that have been genetically modified, via labeling. The labeling burden, of course, would fall on the sellers of the food. Backers believe consumers are entitled to know ...www.vvdailypress.com
Where Do You Stand: GMO Labeling and Prop. 37
"The passing of Prop 37 will go a long ways to stopping the continued dangerous proliferation of GMOs in this country; with GMOs now found in as much as 80 percent of conventional packaged foods, we are more committed than ever to helping people find ...sananselmofairfax.patch.com
Letters: Prop. 37
"Prop. 37: No way to address an important issue" is the headline of your (Sept. 29) editorial rejecting Proposition 37, which would label genetically modified organisms (GMO) in foods in California. How would you address it? If you feel that this ...www.utsandiego.com
Problems with modified foods outweigh benefits
Some arguments against Proposition 37 are that this law (which merely requires labeling of genetically engineered foods) will substantially increase food costs, was written by lawyers, encourages lawsuits, exempts "special interests" and creates fear ...napavalleyregister.com
No comments:
Post a Comment