Sunday, October 7, 2012

Prop. 37 california

  • Prop. 37 Will Test California's Appetite For GMO Food

    International food and chemical conglomerates, including Monsanto Co. and DuPont Co., have contributed about $35 million to defeat Proposition 37 on the November ballot. It also would ban labeling or advertising genetically altered food as "natural.

    www.huffingtonpost.com

  • GUEST OPINION: No on Prop. 37

    Proposition 37 amounts to a California-only ban of tens of thousands of perfectly safe, common grocery products containing genetically engineered ingredients, unless they are specially repackaged, relabeled or remade with higher-cost ingredients.

    www.pressdemocrat.com

  • Prop 37: California Soil Scientist Says Label Up!

    For some reason, Proposition 37, or The Right to Know Genetically Engineered Foods Act, has the food, biotech and pesticide industries shaking in their fancy, fat-cat boots.

    www.huffingtonpost.com

  • No on Prop. 37: IN CASE YOU MISSED IT, Nine More California Newspapers ...

    No on Prop. 37: IN CASE YOU MISSED IT, Nine More California Newspapers Oppose Prop. 37. Quicklink submitted by Tracy Turner (Add your own quicklinks easily with the OpEdNews Quick Link Browser bookmark).

    www.opednews.com

  • GUEST OPINION: Yes on Prop. 37

    Struggling farmers should not be made dependent on the very pesticide companies that are destroying their businesses. These are the same companies that have spent $34.5 million to defeat Proposition 37. The overwhelming majority of people in California ...

    www.pressdemocrat.com

  • Foes of Prop. 37 forced to alter ad

    And the claim that Prop. 37 "would cost California taxpayers millions for more bureaucracy and red tape," overestimates the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office's annual cost of a few hundred thousand dollars to $1 million.

    www.sfgate.com

  • University of California at Davis Reports Make Dubious Claims on Prop 37

    The first, entitled "California's Proposition 37: Effects of Mandatory Labeling of GM Food," was co-authored by University of California at Davis professor Colin Carter and published in the newsletter of the University of California Giannini Foundation ...

    www.huffingtonpost.com

  • California Prop 37 - Rebuttal to Annoying Pro-GMO TV Ads

    The Showa Denko Tryptophan disaster killed 37 and permanently disabled 1,500 people in the US via a disease known as eosonophil myalgia syndrome (EMS) in circa 1989-1991.

    www.opednews.com

  • Say 'yes' to Prop. 37

    Say 'yes' to Prop. 37. Published By Times Heraldtimesheraldonline.com. Posted: 10/05/2012 01:04:19 AM PDT. One of the most understated propositions in California is Proposition 37. This proposition will require pre-packaged foods to indicate, by label, ...

    www.timesheraldonline.com

  • In Prop 37 food fight, is fair play losing out?

    In the bruising, high-dollar battle over California's Proposition 37, truth has often been a casualty. On Nov. 6, voters will decide whether to approve the country's first law requiring labels for genetically modified foods.

    www.mercurynews.com

  • No on Prop. 37: IN CASE YOU MISSED IT, Nine More Newspapers Oppose Prop ...

    SACRAMENTO, Calif., Oct. 2, 2012 - SACRAMENTO, Calif., Oct. 2, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- In recent editorials, nine more California newspapers joined the growing list of publications urging voters to oppose Proposition 37 on the November ballot.

    www.heraldonline.com

  • Prop 37 Will Increase Lawsuit Abuse in California

    I recently joined many of my county supervisor colleagues throughout California in opposition to Prop 37, a deceptive, deeply flawed food labeling scheme.

    www.foxandhoundsdaily.com

  • Calif. initiative will test appetite for GMO food

    International food and chemical conglomerates are spending millions to defeat California's Proposition 37, which would require labeling on all food made with altered genetic material.

    www.newstimes.com

  • Are Monsanto's Fingerprints on This Op-Ed Signed by a UC Davis Professor?

    This conflict of interest explains in part why we are seeing several UC Davis professors author reports and op-eds opposing California's Proposition 37, which would require labeling of foods containing GMOs. The latest example was published last week ...

    www.huffingtonpost.com

  • Prop 37 will hurt every Californian

    According to one estimate, Prop 37 will make the average California family spend an extra $350 per year on food. That's because the law will demand new methods of production, distribution, and packaging.

    westernfarmpress.com

  • No on Prop. 37 opinion: Genetically engineered food-labeling law is too flawed

    However, a close read of Proposition 37 reveals a complicated and deeply flawed measure that includes special-interest loopholes, would increase grocery bills for California families, open a floodgate of shakedown lawsuits and increase state ...

    www.thereporter.com

  • Say yes to Prop. 37 and goodbye to food industry's smoke and mirrors

    Proposition 37, also known as the California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act, will require labels to let consumers know if their food has been genetically modified.

    www.goldengatexpress.org

  • PRO: Should genetically engineered foods be labeled?

    Proposition 37, the California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act, will be on the November ballot. Companies such as Monsanto, Dupont and Syngenta will probably create ads telling us that labeling is expensive and unnecessary because GMOs ...

    www.jewishjournal.com

  • Campaign Finance: Prop 37 Opponents Leave Advocates in Dust

    Monsanto Company, alone, has contributed $7.1 million in opposition to Proposition 37, which would require genetically modified food to be labeled, according to MapLight Voter's Edge for California, a self-described nonpartisan guide to ballot measures.

    www.foodproductdesign.com

  • Proposition 37 is unnecessary

    Enacted by voters in 1986, Prop. 65 required disclosure of hazardous chemicals." That's where the signs on public buildings in this state warning that something on the premises is "known to the state of California to cause cancer" came from. Mr ...

    www.vvdailypress.com

No comments:

Post a Comment