Prop. 37 Will Test California's Appetite For GMO Food
International food and chemical conglomerates, including Monsanto Co. and DuPont Co., have contributed about $35 million to defeat Proposition 37 on the November ballot. It also would ban labeling or advertising genetically altered food as "natural.www.huffingtonpost.com
GUEST OPINION: No on Prop. 37
Proposition 37 amounts to a California-only ban of tens of thousands of perfectly safe, common grocery products containing genetically engineered ingredients, unless they are specially repackaged, relabeled or remade with higher-cost ingredients.www.pressdemocrat.com
Prop 37: California Soil Scientist Says Label Up!
For some reason, Proposition 37, or The Right to Know Genetically Engineered Foods Act, has the food, biotech and pesticide industries shaking in their fancy, fat-cat boots.www.huffingtonpost.com
No on Prop. 37: IN CASE YOU MISSED IT, Nine More California Newspapers ...
No on Prop. 37: IN CASE YOU MISSED IT, Nine More California Newspapers Oppose Prop. 37. Quicklink submitted by Tracy Turner (Add your own quicklinks easily with the OpEdNews Quick Link Browser bookmark).www.opednews.com
GUEST OPINION: Yes on Prop. 37
Struggling farmers should not be made dependent on the very pesticide companies that are destroying their businesses. These are the same companies that have spent $34.5 million to defeat Proposition 37. The overwhelming majority of people in California ...www.pressdemocrat.com
Foes of Prop. 37 forced to alter ad
And the claim that Prop. 37 "would cost California taxpayers millions for more bureaucracy and red tape," overestimates the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office's annual cost of a few hundred thousand dollars to $1 million.www.sfgate.com
University of California at Davis Reports Make Dubious Claims on Prop 37
The first, entitled "California's Proposition 37: Effects of Mandatory Labeling of GM Food," was co-authored by University of California at Davis professor Colin Carter and published in the newsletter of the University of California Giannini Foundation ...www.huffingtonpost.com
California Prop 37 - Rebuttal to Annoying Pro-GMO TV Ads
The Showa Denko Tryptophan disaster killed 37 and permanently disabled 1,500 people in the US via a disease known as eosonophil myalgia syndrome (EMS) in circa 1989-1991.www.opednews.com
Say 'yes' to Prop. 37
Say 'yes' to Prop. 37. Published By Times Heraldtimesheraldonline.com. Posted: 10/05/2012 01:04:19 AM PDT. One of the most understated propositions in California is Proposition 37. This proposition will require pre-packaged foods to indicate, by label, ...www.timesheraldonline.com
In Prop 37 food fight, is fair play losing out?
In the bruising, high-dollar battle over California's Proposition 37, truth has often been a casualty. On Nov. 6, voters will decide whether to approve the country's first law requiring labels for genetically modified foods.www.mercurynews.com
No on Prop. 37: IN CASE YOU MISSED IT, Nine More Newspapers Oppose Prop ...
SACRAMENTO, Calif., Oct. 2, 2012 - SACRAMENTO, Calif., Oct. 2, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- In recent editorials, nine more California newspapers joined the growing list of publications urging voters to oppose Proposition 37 on the November ballot.www.heraldonline.com
Prop 37 Will Increase Lawsuit Abuse in California
I recently joined many of my county supervisor colleagues throughout California in opposition to Prop 37, a deceptive, deeply flawed food labeling scheme.www.foxandhoundsdaily.com
Calif. initiative will test appetite for GMO food
International food and chemical conglomerates are spending millions to defeat California's Proposition 37, which would require labeling on all food made with altered genetic material.www.newstimes.com
Are Monsanto's Fingerprints on This Op-Ed Signed by a UC Davis Professor?
This conflict of interest explains in part why we are seeing several UC Davis professors author reports and op-eds opposing California's Proposition 37, which would require labeling of foods containing GMOs. The latest example was published last week ...www.huffingtonpost.com
Prop 37 will hurt every Californian
According to one estimate, Prop 37 will make the average California family spend an extra $350 per year on food. That's because the law will demand new methods of production, distribution, and packaging.westernfarmpress.com
No on Prop. 37 opinion: Genetically engineered food-labeling law is too flawed
However, a close read of Proposition 37 reveals a complicated and deeply flawed measure that includes special-interest loopholes, would increase grocery bills for California families, open a floodgate of shakedown lawsuits and increase state ...www.thereporter.com
Say yes to Prop. 37 and goodbye to food industry's smoke and mirrors
Proposition 37, also known as the California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act, will require labels to let consumers know if their food has been genetically modified.www.goldengatexpress.org
PRO: Should genetically engineered foods be labeled?
Proposition 37, the California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act, will be on the November ballot. Companies such as Monsanto, Dupont and Syngenta will probably create ads telling us that labeling is expensive and unnecessary because GMOs ...www.jewishjournal.com
Campaign Finance: Prop 37 Opponents Leave Advocates in Dust
Monsanto Company, alone, has contributed $7.1 million in opposition to Proposition 37, which would require genetically modified food to be labeled, according to MapLight Voter's Edge for California, a self-described nonpartisan guide to ballot measures.www.foodproductdesign.com
Proposition 37 is unnecessary
Enacted by voters in 1986, Prop. 65 required disclosure of hazardous chemicals." That's where the signs on public buildings in this state warning that something on the premises is "known to the state of California to cause cancer" came from. Mr ...www.vvdailypress.com
Sunday, October 7, 2012
Prop. 37 california
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment